Showing posts with label quality control. Show all posts
Showing posts with label quality control. Show all posts

Monday, 25 May 2009

NIST Engineers Discover Fundamental Flaw in Transistor Theory

A reprint from The National Institute for Standards Tech Beat (May 20th, 2009):

There�s a newfound flaw in our understanding of transistor noise, a phenomenon affecting the electronic on-off switch that makes computer circuits possible. According to the engineers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) who discovered the problem, it will soon stand in the way of creating more efficient, lower-powered devices like cell phones and pacemakers unless we solve it.

While exploring transistor behavior, the team found evidence that a widely accepted model explaining errors caused by electronic �noise� in the switches does not fit the facts. A transistor must be made from highly purified materials to function; defects in these materials, like rocks in a stream, can divert the flow of electricity and cause the device to malfunction. This, in turn, makes it appear to fluctuate erratically between �on� and �off� states. For decades, the engineering community has largely accepted a theoretical model that identifies these defects and helps guide designers� efforts to mitigate them.

Those days are ending, says NIST�s Jason Campbell, who has studied the fluctuations between on-off states in progressively smaller transistors. The theory, known as the elastic tunneling model, predicts that as transistors shrink, the fluctuations should correspondingly increase in frequency.

However, Campbell�s group at NIST has shown that even in nanometer-sized transistors, the fluctuation frequency remains the same. �This implies that the theory explaining the effect must be wrong,� Campbell said. �The model was a good working theory when transistors were large, but our observations clearly indicate that it�s incorrect at the smaller nanoscale regimes where industry is headed.�

The findings have particular implications for the low-power transistors currently in demand in the latest high-tech consumer technology, such as laptop computers. Low-power transistors are coveted because using them on chips would allow devices to run longer on less power�think cell phones that can run for a week on a single charge or pacemakers that operate for a decade without changing the battery. But Campbell says that the fluctuations his group observed grow even more pronounced as the power decreased. �This is a real bottleneck in our development of transistors for low-power applications,� he says. �We have to understand the problem before we can fix it�and troublingly, we don�t know what�s actually happening.�

Campbell, who credits NIST colleague K.P. Cheung for first noticing the possibility of trouble with the theory, presented* some of the group�s findings at an industry conference on May 19, 2009, in Austin, Texas. Researchers from the University of Maryland College Park and Rutgers University also contributed to the study.


* J.P. Campbell, L.C. Yu, K.P. Cheung, J. Qin, J.S. Suehle, A. Oates, K. Sheng. Large Random Telegraph Noise in Sub-Threshold Operation of Nano-scale nMOSFETs. 2009 IEEE International Conference on Integrated Circuit Design and Technology. Austin, Texas. May 19, 2009; and Random Telegraph Noise in Highly Scaled nMOSFETs. 2009 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium, Montreal, Canada, April 29, 2009.

Wednesday, 3 September 2008

400 years of QA - not much has changed

In a recent ACM Communications article George V. Neville-Neil describes the QA process involved when the Swedish Navy tested the (now infamous) Vasa battle ship:

In 1628 the ship was finally ready for quality assurance (QA) testing. Seventeenth-century QA of ships was a bit different from what might happen today. Thirty sailors were picked and asked to run back and forth, port to starboard, across the deck of the ship. If the ship didn't tip over and sink, then the ship passed the test. You did not want to be on the QA team in 1628. After only three runs across the deck the Vasa began to tilt wildly and the test was canceled. The test may have been canceled, but not the project. On August 10, 1628, in a light breeze, the Vasa set sail. She was less than a mile from dock when a stiff breeze knocked her sideways. She took on water, and sank ... killing 30 to 50 sailors. In response to the catastrophe, the King wrote a letter insisting that incompetence had been the reason for the disaster (even though the King was the project manager and chief architect). Of course, the King could not be held at fault, so the final verdict was an "act of God."
Some personal footnotes:
  • QA still using antiquated methods for testing
  • Projects continue along blindly believing nothing is wrong even after QA flags serious errors
  • 'acts of God' still being invoked by managers to explain defects

Wednesday, 21 March 2007

Importance of Quality Control

When I read the following headlines, I just have to sit back, scratch my head and ask, "What the heck is going on?" Where's the quality control?

Elementary state achievement tests contain errors, board says -- Northwest Herald, Illinois

Many of the errors � ranging from wrong directions on how to complete the exams to multiple-choice questions without a correct answer as an option � were caught before the March 13 testing window opened. School administrators were sent instructions on how to address the mistakes. For example, in seventh-grade reading booklets, students are directed to answer a question on the wrong page. A sixth-grade math question calls for answers in centimeters, but all multiple choice answers are in inches. Other mistakes are in the instructional manual and a Braille test.


Tests of Suspect Pet Food Kills 7 -- CBS

As many as seven animals died in tests of suspect dog and cat food by the manufacturer after complaints the products were poisoning pets around the country, the government said Monday.

I have to ask the obvious, if seven animals die while testing the pet food, why would you release the product?